But since laziness is one of the major reasons why people plagiarize and make use of AI, with the time and research that most people spend just to discover a way they can use to humanize AI-written content, if they also invest the same time in learning, can’t they just expand and present something from their head, or is laziness not just the only issue here, but most of them lack what to offer and just need an AI to do the thinking for them? Or it could probably be a lack of self-confidence.
Both a lack of knowledge and self-confidence are the reasons why people use AI to generate posts for them, because they understand that an AI model will have more knowledge about the topic than them do, and then it will also be able to produce better words, sentences, paragraphs, etc.
It's a valid argument that those who spend so much time generating AI content and then using tools to humanize them to avoid getting detected can spend the same amount of time or even less in thinking and then writing something on their own, but as I said, a lack of knowledge and an ability to think and come up with valid and unique points themselves is a feature they don't posses. This is the reason why they don't care about the amount of time they might have to spend on it, because in the end, they manage to post something that they could never think of themselves.
