Too many threads and too many suggestions already that don't directly use an exchange address to receive payments from signature campaigns, use a non-custodial wallet then send it to the exchange they want for safety and security purposes, why people cant get it.
I do agree, I can't fathom that someone in a campaign is using a centralized exchange to received their payment?
I call it lazyness and too much trust to a central platform since it didn't happened before
Actually I think this is not about laziness or threads that have been opened about some of this mistakes, errors cum normal way to go about cryptocurrency and wallets, I think some people don't just understand what they are doing or writing about yet they are contributing to threads. It is a different thing to contribute and to know what you are contributing on. That exchange is divided into two as decentralized and centralized, meaning you have control of anything decentralized like bitcoin for example and you don't have control of centralized like kucoin as the current issue including its wallet. So using kucoin wallet address to receive signature payment means you don't have control over it. That's appalling for someone making such mistake to their own detriment.
However to the issue, I think it is a lesson to those who are still having their coins on CEX. The earlier you move them out to non custodial wallet like Trust wallet etc, the better it can be.