The tool works like this. You enter your username, then you have to set 3 parameters (only if you are part of a signature campaign) which are max posts per week ex. 25. Max post in local board e.g. 10, min post in gambling section e.g. 10
Then the tool considers that you have reached your goals only if you make the min in gambling and max in local board. Then there are other settings such as enabling or disabling the Merit received part or not to consider valid posts written in offtopic or mega threads etc etc
I might add other options too but for the moment I think it's fine as it is
But, so you're assuming that all existing campaigns have these types of minimums. Which does not happen in all of them.
Some have no limit on the locations, others may not require you to post in the game area.
So have only these options and limit analysis.
But, it's just my opinion. If whoever uses the script is fine like this, that's fine.
Yours is a more than fair observation. I know little about signature campaigns, and I relied on the actual signature campaigns (not all of them to be honest) and assumed that they were all or nearly all the same.
But this is no big deal, I will try to check the code by studying a different logic. Currently you can do a simple mathematical calculation
Do you have to make 20 posts a week? Of which 10 minimum in gambling? Just put in the settings 20 posts max 10 min in gambling and 10 max in local, the tool will still warn you that you have met your targets 🙂 🙂