Reaching out to only one campaign manager does not make sense unless the flag creator knows that there is a bad competition between managers and icopress usually quick to react negatively to a casino that is handled by other managers with the support of some of the close buddies he has like gazeta, JG and a few more.
You make a claim here that can equally be considered biased, like what you accuse others of.
I don't think we should look at whether a service deserves a flag or not, based on the signature of the campaign. Already based on the presented facts and evidence. It is always useful if a proven, reputable member can confirm the accuracy of the evidence.
I don't think that managers should have a consensus on whether to support or use a flag.