ok, the list on this website is bullshit, it's not just misleading, but outright just lying.
I have been saying this
from the beginning. Looks like OP has gotten good success by misleading the users with the wrong information about KYC. A casino directory should do the business transparently. I can see 5 casino names at the top of the list there which say KYC level is zero. But all of them (Winna, Cryptorino, Thrill, Betpanda and Cybet) have the KYC verification requirement mentioned in their terms. And they reserve the right to apply it any time. Anyway, OP will give you
a response like this.
Why will a project's name say "NOKYC" and the casino goes one to otherwise. Something is wrong somewhere. I don't think that it is a deliberate misleading. It could be a huge underlaying contradiction. I also believe that there are no 100% KYC free casinos. Even if they said they don't require KYC, at a time they will still require it when things go South. Majority of these NoKYC casinos are casinos who KYC are not so strict. It will be fine if they call themselves "Ease KYC casinos".