Bitcoin's acceptance amongst individuals and households is spending like wild fire, because of the various advantages it poses. Now comes the question; would you rather adopt Bitcoin as a tool for spending or saving? Yes, I'm guessing you'll say you use it for both. If your usage is going to be weighed, which side would unbalance the scale? As a tool for spending, it is flexible enough to be carried irrespective of volume and large purchases can be made, just to mention a few. As a tool for saving and a store of value. The value of the saved asset has great potential to appreciate. Which would you rather do?
If Bitcoin were accepted as legal tender, especially across countries or the world, it would undoubtedly be an option for both spending and saving. However, we know that currently, there are several restrictions, so most people are saving Bitcoin, or perhaps what could be called a "reserve asset". However, I believe it would be better if Bitcoin could be used for both purposes, as this would allow anyone to save and spend financially securely. This would be very different from storing fiat currency, which has a high potential for depreciation due to inflation, especially if money is printed at any time, when policy requires it, even though there is no clear fundamental or underlying at all, and some say the underlying is "confidence", is this real ? cmiiw.
Personally I would use it for both, but for now I can only use it for saving because of the restriction on spending using Bitcoin in my country, and if both are possible, then I will leave fiat, switch to Bitcoin forever, and I am sure people who understand Bitcoin will do the same.