Apologies for the delay on this response, I have been doing some digging. There will be an update shortly that will close this case, proving that N8snathan knowingly bet on a fixed outcome and has been intentionally dragging our name through the mud here.


As an aside, it has been an incredibly disappointing experience on this forum that a new account can come and sling a false sports scam accusation at us and within the span of 2 days, our entire brand on the forum has taken a hit.

I know for a fact that you can buy the support of a 'DT' - I know this because since the flag has been raised, I have had multiple people reaching out offering to remove it for $10k or thereabouts. If that's all it takes to temporarily ruin the reputation of a platform that takes so much pride in being a safe place to play, then I don't think we want to continue being meaningfully involved in this forum.

We have been operating in this space for nearly 3 years, we have learned the ropes around offering a sportsbook and identifying suspicious bets. It's not easy, and most new platforms can attest that if you don't know what to look for, then you'll get abused very hard. To have members of the forum who don't know anything about running a sportsbook or what a fixed bet looks like trying to tell us what is or is not suspicious is very frustrating. If I have seemed unprofessional or disrespectful at any point in this thread, I apologise - it can be quite tiring dealing with known scammers who will do whatever they can to tarnish your name. As well as that, due to the nature of these bets, we are in a tricky position; when we flagged the bet, we had a high degree of certainty with all the facts we had that it was a suspicious bet, but it is difficult to convey those details to anyone who is not involved in our platform or has no knowledge of running a sportsbook.


As I mentioned previously, most centralised forum/review sites will not touch sports complaints because they understand that there is a significant amount of nuance when it comes to these cases. I would recommend that Bitcointalk adopt the same framework, otherwise you'll quickly become the hub for where sports abusers come to raise a ruckus and attempt to get fraudulent bets paid.

Those in the fixing world know that there are some fixed bets which are characterised as '100% clean', meaning that providers will not raise flags. N8snathan was told that this bet was 100% clean, which is why he's fighting it so hard and is obviously convinced we have no proof that it was a fix. Unfortunately for him, we do have proof. I'm deciding on the best way of getting that to you all.