I’ve been wondering about this.. when we submit our KYC documents to online casinos, are we actually safer with the old, established ones compared to the newer platforms?
Both types usually claim to be licensed and regulated, but the question is -- does having more years in the industry really mean they handle our data better? Or are we just assuming that because they’ve built a reputation?
Some newer casinos might use the latest security standards since they’re just starting out, while the older ones might already have proven systems in place (or maybe outdated ones). At the end of the day, we’re handing over sensitive information like IDs, addresses, and banking details.
So what do you guys think, are established casinos really more trustworthy with our KYC data, or should we treat all of them with the same level of caution?
So far, I feel secure with my data, and therefore, I trust it, especially with established casinos I frequent. Trust is built over time and with a casino's integrity in protecting its customers. The key is time, not just flowery words.
New casinos have vulnerabilities, and trust is still being built. The risks are certainly greater with new casinos.
It's important to remember that everything, whether old or new, still carries risks to your data, even if it can't be stated directly.