Re: 📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝
There's also Roobet, which requires 15 weekly posts and a fairly high payout of $70 there are no mandatory posts on gambling, so it's worth it.
Honestly, I won't be a hypocrite; I'd choose $100/week with 30 posts because the payout is quite decent.
But if it were $50/week with 15 posts long-term, I'd choose this.
In fact, back in the day during the ICO climax... somewhere 2017 - 2018-ish, there we also quite a number of altcoin signature campaigns that just required 10 posts per week. Of course, payment would be in altcoins and afterward, the altcoins paid out would pump like crazy. I believe most of the Bitcoin paying campaign required around 10 - 15 posts per week, except for a few.Honestly, I won't be a hypocrite; I'd choose $100/week with 30 posts because the payout is quite decent.
But if it were $50/week with 15 posts long-term, I'd choose this.
What a good time it was, even for a Jr Member or Member Rank
I confirm that, good old days. It was easier to join signature campaign and minimum requirements for posts was easier to achieve. It is true that moderation required a lot of efforts because the number of participants was huge.
When the merit system came, it limited everything and some infringements were done by some people to allow random members growing up in ranks but it remains isolated cases AFAIK. The ban of mixers was the second major event in the signature campaign history. By the way, before all of that events, signature campaign management wasn't as organised as that and sometimes there isn't a real manager. It was the owner who accepted members and moderators ban them in case of abuse.
All these steps are in line to shut down the signature campaigns one day. Maybe not today but in the future.