So in a case where a team is failing, sometimes it could be a case where the players are no completely listening to the coach or a case where the coach isn't strategic enough. So sometimes it could be the fault of the player's and sometimes it's the coach, depending on the reason for the failure.
This could be correct if the second team wont listen to their coach, and your team does so you win in the end. Both teams listen to what coach say, both teams have prepared tactics for the game, both have players have same two legs, to hands, however in the end only one team wins. Which means listening to coach isnt the only reason why team can win or lose. I would say that team where players are more skilled and play together as team wins, because there are numerous examples where team listen to the coach, team has talented individuals, and still lose.
I agree with you. However, there are a lot of things to put into consideration when a team did not perform as expected and lost the game. The coach and the players might perform their best to see that the team comes out victorious but if they clash with a team with a better game strategy than theirs, they'll be outplayed.
It's only if the coach doesn't know what he's doing and how to improve the team performance is when the coach is to be blamed and vice versa. Sometimes, a team do experience a hard luck when playing on the pitch, no matter the amount of efforts that they put into the game to make sure that they win, they will end up losing the game.