Understandable. Am not associated with them in any manner whatsoever, but I must point out the fact that they did in fact prove that the alleged victim was involved in betting on fixed matches negating their negative trust feedback.
Thanks for pointing that out. I will keep it in mind when I take a look at the case and decide whether I should remove them or not. Betting money on matches proven to have been fixed is of course a big no go, and if that's what the player was doing and the casino proved it, then they have the right to protect themselves by any means.
Their new site(Bitcoin-betting) seems a lot better than Fairlay based on what I observed.
I think you are not the first one to say that. I have heard it mentioned before. Let's see...