Actually, I am not reading it that way, the OP is not saying that the poor people should get something,
but making the point that the poor in general will remain poor while the rich get richer and that its
difficult/impossible for the poor to bridge the gap.
The OP is actually making it look like bitcoin should be bridging the gap between the rich and the poor which in other respects bitcoin has done because we all regardless of status gets the same benefits with bitcoin without any censorship and the fact that there is no power bestowed on any class, for example it is not like POS coins where rich stakeholders actually get huge return in favour, here if the market actually goes up 2x everyone gets 2x price increase and nothing more to beat that.
What OP is actually asking of is bitcoin leaning towards the poor more than the rich is that fair? I honestly do not actually see why bitcoin should be discussed in this regard because if you treat it as an investment it is clear that everyone that has the money can invest into it and possible get return of his investment, this means that he who higher amount gets more reward if he turns out well and he also bears more risk if the investment takes a different turn. This is how investment works and nothing that bitcoin can do.
The only people who had got advantage over anyone in this bitcoin space is the people who had early believe in bitcoin and that’s also a reward for taking the bigger risky when everyone was running away