this is my understanding of the four Es. do you agree or no?
Sometimes individuals are too smart, that's how they measure, examine and identify problematic gamblers, sometimes to be understood for ordinary people to measure, research and identify them psychologically.
Like the points I saw at the source:
Two groups of participants were selected for the 1-year follow-up interviews, including (1) persons who had gambling problems, high-risk alcohol abuse problems, and/or substance abuse problems (abuse group); and (2) a random selection of other persons from the original survey (random group). The results indicated that the "Excess" trait, which measures impulsive behavior, was predictive of relative increases in gambling problems for both groups over the 1-year period.
Of course the risk is a real problem for gamblers and also their behavior, in my assessment the Four E instrument is produced on the basis of the measurement of the source, Indeed that is the fact that happened in the field, regardless of what Four E or Four H, Four G. Everything can be accepted.