You can't just move money bigger money requires bigger reasons.
In order to move you need reasons and big money requires geopolitical volatility and changes often they not pleasent but how you move big money or how you take big money and wealth so you need geopolitical reasons.
Specially when goverment offialials circles want to put state money in their pockets.
If you want to know who benefits, just follow the flow of money. Because you brought up the issue of geopolitical action to mobilize money/wealth, my mind immediately thought of the slogan "winner takes all" that resonated after the United States' victory in World War II.
"Winner takes all" means the United States took almost all the dividends of victory in the war. Economically, the US became the center of global capitalism. Politically, the US designed the world order (UN, Bretton Woods). Militarily, the US monopolized the initial nuclear power and global bases. Culturally, the US exported its lifestyle and ideology. In other words, World War II was not just about defeating an enemy, but also marked the birth of Pax Americana, an era of US dominance on the world stage.
The factor that made the US "Winner Takes All" is a comparison of pre- and post-war conditions. Before the war, the US was in recession due to the Great Depression (1929). After the war, the US emerged as the largest economy, with approximately 50% of world GDP in 1945. Military and nuclear dominance: only the US successfully created and used atomic bombs (Hiroshima and Nagasaki). The largest naval fleet, military bases spread across Europe, Asia, and the Pacific, gave it status. global military hegemony. War technology (radar, early computers, jets, V2 rockets brought from Germany through Operation Paperclip) strengthened scientific and industrial dominance.