Why you claim that Fairlay_Support is "not so trustworthy"?
Can you not see their negative feedback? They have 3 red tags by different members of this forum thanks to a controversial case sometime back where they allegedly seized funds from a gambler in an unlawful manner.
It was later proven that he was actually involved in match fixing which is why they didn't really do anything illegal in that case, but the negative feedback remained.
I am familiar with that alleged match fixing case ,after reading most of thread on this forum.
Be that as it may , does this dispute that FairLay had against probably indeed a match fixer that won quite an amount on their site , with FairLay not granting him his winnings , prevent you from giving a try to Bitcoin-Betting.com ?
And if that's the case , is it because you fear of them withholding your balance ?
I haven't used them yet , but I was really considering it up until this point so I would like to hear the opinion of a senior member like you ,Haunebu.
Fairlay/Bitcoin-Betting are fine. I'll repost a previous post. These guys are the safest by far of all the sportsbooks.
They have $84m in cold storage.
https://fairlay.com/faq/#proof-of-reserves https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/1EV8YeieYEZ7iksGT9jS7KdcbE12pk4FwZ. Both Fairlay and efialtis are good guys but the wires got crossed somewhere in the match-fixing thread. efialtis saw the same evidence as the Gambling Integrity Unit. The Gambling Integrity Unit said the matches were fixed. Everyone that looked at Fairlay's first posts knew the matches were fixed.
Quick Recap1. Fairlay posted evidence of match fixing.
2. efialtis was asked to arbitrate. He said, "no".
3. holydarkness was asked to be sole arbitrator and didn't accept.
4. Fairlay followed with posts asking for someone to arbitrate. No one answered.
If you feel qualified to handle the case, you may apply in this thread.
We are still looking for a reputable arbitrator to settle this between us.
@newfish1 wouid you agree to have askgamblers.com as arbitrator in this case?
Anyway, we will wait for arbitrator's decision and will follow suit.
We were contacted by another party who was working for a Betting Integrity Unit and hopefully can help us find the best arbitrator with the necessary experience
nor any further information shared until these investigations are completed.
5. Fairlay left the thread. A misunderstanding occurred. Posters kept posting about the case for a month after Fairlay left.
6. Sports Integrity expert Francesco Baranca said the games are one hundred percent manipulated.
A football club in the fourth tier of Finnish football has become a tool of organised criminals involved in sports betting, according to Turun Sanomat.
TS interviewed Francesco Baranca, a sports integrity expert, who follows live betting markets during sports events to try and identify manipulation.
He says that one club's performances this season can only be explained by criminal involvement.
"The numbers are so absurd that there's no doubt about the manipulation," said Baranca. "The games are one hundred percent manipulated, you can't explain them any other way."
https://yle.fi/a/74-20102346