You are using the term "Compounding effect" incorrecty.
You probably meant to say cumulative effect.
Compounding effect tends to be used to describe something that grows in value, such as bitcoin.
back up funds are kept in cash and they are likely ongoingly losing value (since the cash is debasing), yet if we are building up an emergency fund, then nominally it will keep growing as we keep adding to it.. so it is a cumulative effect and not a compounding effect.
Bitcoin grows in value, so for example every time it doubles in value (not quantity), then the next time it goes to double again, the original value plus the gained value will double upon itself. So for example if we look at bitcoin from 250 until now, it has doubled in value nearly 9 times (I list out the compounding value of bitcoin in
this post), even though the nominal might not have had changed.. Frequently the term compounding is used in the context of interest or yield, but it can also be used in terms of value.
Oh how clumsy of me... And you're absolutely correct. I initially wanted to say cumulative effect and not compounding effect. But thanks a lot for pointing this out and for taking out time to clarify the distinction between the two. Indeed, Backup funds do really grow cumulatively when we constantly replenish or add to them, while Bitcoin's growth on the other hand could be better described as being compounding since the gains doesn't only depend on the investor's adding to it alone but also builds on top of gains. The correction was well noted and appreciated as it helps to keep the terminology precise and the communication clearer.
✂️✂️✂️✂️
We need to figure out our own internal rules upon what conditions we might draw down our funds, and then for example, if the funds get to such a low point that they are considered emergency funds, we might stop buying more bitcoin and/or take other measure to protect ourselves, maybe cut back on certain expenses and maybe start looking harder for ways to raise money whether it is working or selling things...
In the beginning we might not have a very large cushion of resources, yet I would think when we get 3-4 years or more into our investment, we should have had built up better systems of back up funds and also built our bitcoin holdings at the same time.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Folks must prioritize treating those funds like a living system, first of all, define the rules, and then as your situation improves, so will those rules evolve too. At first, it might look like it's a bit fragile, since there's no much cushion, but as one proceeds and stays consistent for a few more years, you'll not only have yourself a solid Backup fund, but also a larger and secured Bitcoin portfolio too. The key is sticking to your own rules and avoid breaking them, except of course the situation really requires you to and your hands are completely tied, because the moment one begins to casually dip into their Bitcoin stash, the whole compounding effect that they're trying to capture is automatically threatened and undermined. And the best part of this strategy is that, as time goes on, the habits of protecting one's emergency base and tightening their expenses when the need arises will automatically reinforce themselves, helping one build the resilience naturally.