You have likely worn out your welcome, even when several members have tried to help you out on numerous occasions, and you have abused any possibility of being received with “geniality” or warmth.

Furthermore, your ongoing prodding (including your recent stirring of the pot with the boldenings (and unnecessary shouting, with large text) begs for a some kinds of a tag, perhaps a red one?

It seems to me that you have surpassed three strikes, already.


I don't have any problem in regards to placing some kind of a possibility that BTC spikes 40% in a day or some other short-term spike that plays out for 1 to 3 weeks or even longer.

We already know dee cornz behaves like that on a fairly regular basis, so the exact specifics regarding which piece (or pieces of news or hype) need not be important.

Many of us already are overly weighted long in regards to bitcoin and/or have been stacking bitcoin - or already had stacked bitcoin years back as a kind of front running out of realization that these kinds of matters could play out. So you are really proposing anything outlandish in the eyes of guys who had been studying the cornz.

I don't dabble in various financial instruments to leverage those kinds of plays, since they likely cost some money to keep open, so I am not sure if they are key to getting richie on bitcoin since bitcoin has already given and likely to continue to give richie and more richie than expected, even without playing around with extra instruments (and no need to bet anything other than keeping an ongoing relatively aggressive allocation in dee cornz). .which can also be known as just letting your winners ride (namely bitcoin) without ever really cashing out of it (except in small doses as many of us already ongoingly practice some version of the shaving off of slivers from time to time).


He's retarded in his ongoing self-absorption. Puts wannabe sorcery on another plain.   


Bitcoin does not necessarily reward those who sell with expectations of buying back cheaper.

So there is that angle, too.

In other words, I doubt that viewing bitcoin as a trade (even to try to play the presumptive BIGGER price waves) is a smart way of treating one of the best (if not the best?) of assets that any of us have ever witnessed in our lifetime and such same paradigm-shifting asset is available to everyone and/or anyone around the world... but some guys want to act like they are so smart as to be able to trade it.  It might be more sad than it is funny in a kind of ironic way.


Sounds too bearish to me, even though Up before down is fun.. I just don't like the down part that is being contemplated in the package, as if it were to be necessary.   

But, what do I know?

I kind of like the up before more up version.... but whatever, I will go with the flow whether it is up before down, or up before up or even down before up or down before down.. .. even though the up versions still seem to be in the cards, even though a bunch of bitcoin geeks are likely to get rich as fuck from such price move, yet at the same time, there is likely way more pain to be felt by 99% of the world's population who choose (wittingly or unwittingly) to remain no coiners or low coiners.


A stroke of luck to save your ass (#nohomo) from a less than ideal investment (especially when dee cornz was a competing option).


Referring to the Pompliano interview that you linked, gotta question your judgement  (not that it is the first time) when you are getting investment (really trading) advice from bear-tards - even if they sound smart on the surface. You are just likely to follow (or believe) the same things that you hear from others.

But, hey, whatever.  You might end up being correct.. perhaps?