It is said that bitcoin is also a means of investment used around the world,but if one want to invest it will be someone who has a means or source of income because investment can't take place the person having means or source to.That means the poor people can't invest because they don't have the source of income to make an investment and t left for the the rich ones only (is that true?).
However, it is also meant for both the rich and the poor, but it seems only the rich people have the oppotunty to achive more bitcoin than the poor because they have a source of income which makes me say that the poor cam only accumulate limited Bitcoin.
Although bitcoin can be a good store of value so when though people without a good source of income buy Bitcoin with their small amount of money, in the future they will make little profits.
So do you agree with me that the rich have more advantage to accumulate more Bitcoin than the poor?
This one na obvious true wey everybody know, to accumulate Bitcoin mean say you get money to do so and as Bitcoin dey expensive like this na mostly rich people dey accumulate more. True true Bitcoin na for both the rich and the poor but the rich finds am easy to hold more while the poor go dey struggle to hold. E get way wey poor people go still buy Bitcoin but no be still every poor person go still dey able to afford, the rich just get advantage to everything in life and no be just for Bitcoin investment matter, e no really dey easy for the poor because even after you don manage to hold small amount of Bitcoin you go still need a steady source of income so that you no go fit sell your Bitcoin at the wrong time to take survive.