Most headlines talk about ETFs, Wall Street adoption, and U.S. regulations… but what if the real crypto story is in developing countries? In places like Argentina, Nigeria, and even here in the Philippines, people use crypto for survival - fighting inflation, sending remittances, and daily expenses.
So here’s the question: is the future of crypto shaped by Wall Street investors, or by ordinary people in weaker economies who actually use it?
It should be good because the presence of Bitcoin can change the view of many people to achieve a better life, especially regarding crypto to survive against inflation, send money, and meet daily needs. But for the country you mentioned it might take time to achieve it because it needs resources to run the concept so that it can run well, even though some people may be pessimistic that it will happen, but no one knows how in the future in that country it can run well.
Everything is interconnected because with the occurrence of widespread adoption, the Bitcoin journey itself should be better. The general public is also one of the reasons why Bitcoin can be like now because the adoption that occurs actually makes Bitcoin increasingly gain trust. Developed countries and developing countries need enough bitcoin in the general category because this is related to the pattern of adoption that occurs.