It's no news that crypto currency popularity has taken more of a centre stage in the worlds economy. Consequently many governments of the world have started to dish out in the eyes of some; strict rules, and the other, rules to protect.
The first fraction see these rules as a means disrupting more engagements, even for potential new subscribers. And some of these rules are stricter is some countries with some persons even contemplating migration.
The other fraction would argue that these rules would guide against scam, volatile nature and other potential risks especially for new subscribers.
Off course there could be a balance where the strictness may be reduced, and more information provided in order to curb the potential risks.
Expressing in percentage; would you say 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, 70:30, 30:70......?
At the beginning there was a lot of talk from most governments about using regulations to ban cryptocurrency, primarily due to the fact most politicians didn't understand it and that'll always make something an easier target. Some countries like China even banned it for a time (not sure if it still is?), likely because it's a risk to their centralized form of authoritarian government and allowed people to have money outside the banking system. In more recent years, many developed countries have started to come around to the idea and began regulating so it can sit along side the traditional banking / payment networks, but it is still treated with some caution and in the high risk asset category - but the risk is somewhat decreasing with age.