Like I said, it's unlikely I can win a case against unknown owners of an unlicensed online gambling site (and I know this fact), but Micon's a US citizen, and I'm sure he's violating laws by promoting this site.
I had nothing to do with any collusion.
They seem to be suggesting that there were other players signed in on your same IP at the same time. Whether that's true or not should just be a matter of the facts. "I had nothing to do with any collusion" seems like a very weak argument in this case.
I think the other weird thing about your stance here is that you seem to be suggesting that you are going to get Micon into trouble by accusing him of defrauding you while taking part in the same illegal activity. That is, can you really say "you need to get that guy for unlicensed gambling" && "btw, he took my money while i was doing unlicensed gambling"? I'm not a lawyer but it seems like this is a weakness to your stance.