can we have a vote for coins that made the list which we DONT want to help? some real crap on there and seems silly to offer help to them all whn there are much better coins out there. Coins like 66coin and duckduckcoin are just jokes and the idea that resources will be offered and then poured into them if they accept before other much more deserving coins (like datacoin) is not good management imho 
While I understand what you are saying, I must vehemently disagree. I am unfamiliar with 66coin, but I do know (at least a little) about DuckDuckcoin. That was a fun coin (ok, even silly as you put it) that seemed to have a very interested community.
But far more importantly, they are practically begging to be taken over. At one point they were even offering coins to anyone willing to do it. I won't go over the history in detail, but this was one of those IPO coins. So, not only was the community interested (a while ago) but they paid for the privilege.
And as I've stated before, I really think that a success on the first coin of the Coin Revival Foundation is of absolute paramount importance. That success can build momentum for the next coin and help build the community faster than any other thing that they can do. Fighting with some current "developers" (no matter how incompetent) on some random coin is just asking for trouble.
DuckDuck Coin is practically a shell company at this point. There are only 121 coins in its universe and at one point were willing to pay for the privilege of being taken over. Success is not guaranteed, of course, but the road sure is paved.
Now, it does not have to be Duck. Any coin that seems the easiest should be the one chosen first. I sure wouldn't be surprised if a lot of developers would offer up some of their own coins for a chance at revival.