But please, why do you feel it's within your right to attempt restriction of information in regards to the people running this venture?
Because somebody tried to harm his family!!!
You do not feel that is a good reason?
Not sure if you figured this out, but I'm making the assumption he might be lying to you.
It's convenient for people in a difficult position running a dying company to use excuses that cover themselves and their identities.
I could be wrong, but isn't it funny as they now expect all shareholders to hand over their identity (address, passport, etc...) the guy running the show slips off into the shadows.
One rule for
them and another for
us.
My question to you, Minor Miner, why are you ok with being forced to hand over your identity even though this was never a requirement when buying shares in the first place? But you're quick to protect those that are in fact working
against your best interests.