I vote for people that hold the most cash to have the biggest say in what the foundation should do. Oligarchy for the win
So for example if 500 members with a total of 500,000 coins vote that BlackCoin shouldn't be renamed.. but 2 members with millions of coins decide they want to rename the coin. We have to rename the coin. Just because 2 members with more coins made the decision?
Makes sense to me. The more coins you hold, the more you are affected by any decision.
Why should 20 people who own 10 coins each outweigh the opinion of someone who has $20k worth of blackcoin.
Good point, but can't we turn that around? In all fairness, why should someone who is fortunate enough to afford $20k worth of coins be able to have full control over the direction of the coin. Not everyone was born rich... but everyone should have a right to vote fairly. If that's the case, why even bother voting for anything. Let them just take control of the coin and let everyone else have no voice.