Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com
by
underneath_the_water_line
on 10/05/2014, 17:57:25 UTC
Not to collect everyones addresses they are allready in the public blockchain, only identify KNCs

I think it's a wise attempt to atleast be proactive incase they decide to embezzle funds.
1- They are no longer trustworthy
2- They are a company with 1000s of people/customers, so a payout from knc wallet still keeps the anonymity of the people safe.
3- They have started up several different companies on the side and if no one keep taps on the blockchain it will be super easy for them to funnel 10s of million usd away and declare bankruptcy. Not even the government or the law will know what to do.
4- There is nothing that proves that they are not allready embezzling using personal wallets to mine to at "our" DC up north.
5- They built DC with pre-orders money.
6- They are mining more than the 5% that's a breach of contract. Which lowered all miners profits by atleast 10%. Then they pay (after a month or so) refunds with btc that preorders DC allowed them to mine. Basicly raping their so called loyal customers in the ass more than once.
7- Perhaps this helps to find out truly how powerfull the preorder DC really is.
And the list goes on

Summery: probably wise to keep taps on them, and all customers will continue to be as anon as ever.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This thread is currently so spread out that I would prefer further conversation regarding this survey and address collection at a forum dedicated to KNC( http://www.hackmyminer.com/forum/index.php?forum=7)

Question ("From what address did you receive your refund?")
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/15ocLT4yelsQ3TQ59R2x4-TsKXULdAfPB1V6zXrJX-s0/viewform?usp=send_form
 (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/15ocLT4yelsQ3TQ59R2x4-TsKXULdAfPB1V6zXrJX-s0/viewform?usp=send_form)
Submitted addresses
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/15ocLT4yelsQ3TQ59R2x4-TsKXULdAfPB1V6zXrJX-s0/viewanalytics?usp=form_confirm (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/15ocLT4yelsQ3TQ59R2x4-TsKXULdAfPB1V6zXrJX-s0/viewanalytics?usp=form_confirm)

To add to this:

When one asked for a refund and accepted BTC that person probably used a unique address for that transaction. That would've been the proper way to do it and therefore privacy is not really threatened.