Well, I bring up intrinsic value because I believe that that needs to be accounted for when you make investment analysis. If anything, the initial distribution is just one factor in the outcome (X + Y = Z) - basing any conclusions purely off of this one variable *might* give you the right answer (Y happens to = Z), but more than not, it'll be wrong because you didn't account for the other known variables.
So there's nothing wrong with providing this "data", but, as I said, making investment conclusions based off incomplete data is more often wrong than not.
Exactly.
What we have here is an opinion piece disguised as an objective report. The author (in the report comments) is attempting to make a complete argument by blatantly "spinning" incomplete data.
Law enforcement does this all the time by using convenient evidence to make their case while ignoring facts that might exonerate their suspect.