ziplibrary, I am saddened by your reply to my last post (which I didn't even expect but as long as you did , thank you).
You highlighted my post but gave no answers to questions that seem to me very relevant to the very existence to sharecoin.
Multipool organization - weak point (by that I mean execution) yes multipool is there but I hardly can say that it serves its purpose.
New investors - what will make them want to hold sharecoins?
Trading BTC received from multipool the way you did is just unprofessional (to say the least) and unethical to dump at prices that are higher then what is at the market at that moment, and telegraphing to everyone who is market participant what your intentions are is plain ridiculous (you said you would support price at 400, while spread right before that declaration was 387 - 350 (roughly)).
Now in your would be reply you said that price is unexpectedly high (?).
So I sold my last 10k "expecting" of what you are expecting - which is lower price.
TBH, i find that you are guys very good ppl, but as they say "good felow is not a profession".

P.S. Will monitor pricing and rebuy later (if I still like direction of sharex team) and BTW if you are so community oriented, why FEESHARES? Why not let everyone who holds
sharecoins to have 50% of what you get from sharex? I mean did you actually gave it a thought? Why support only those members of community who has problem with basic math (understanding ROI)? Why not just give 50% staked in wallets money?, that would in itself would shoot the price of sharecoin quite high (I would expect it to), instead you are just stomping your feet and saying 20k for FEESHARE IT IS and fighting bad publicity that surrounds this issue.