I do not delete his posts because debate is good and I always said that.
Debate that supporst IE's theories and nobody else's will not get deleted. Question IE or his cronies and you will get deleted. But then again Im 99% positive that brabbas and IE are one and the same. Their style of argument is very similar. OK probably not but how can you leave his hate filled rants full of blatant hyperbole and unibomber-esque style manifestos, but if I say something that points out how you contradicted yourself it is FUD?
Guess that makes you one of BCpool crony or a smurf account of somone :p
nope, i dont care either way really (edit, i saw you use the pool not the foundation. I DO support the pool, but I am against the foundation), but i have seen them be transparent with everything they say and they havent initiated a smear campaign against anybody. I call em like I see em. All ive seen from IE is using his rep to try to sway public opinion and using very specific instances to justify his implications. WITH NO PROOF, other than someone saying that one of the things he said about SOMETHING ELSE was true. How does that make everything else true. In a court of law that would be ludacris, but hey its the internet so he doesnt have to use legit arguments huh? And again, im nobodys smurf account. my gf and I post on this forum and she doesnt even post in the BC threads, so yet again the leaps and bounds you guys take with your accusations are hilarious
edit no. 2 : I noticed youre quick to call me out on WHO I may be not not to say that my argument was wrong or flawed. Thats what Im saying about this whole thread, is it is full of hypocrisy and finger pointers with no concern for facts