Pains me to say it but it was not "near-failed" it was a failure. I am sorry. I am sure the devs did a lot, but i was expecting more second coming type shit the way they were talking. Like Potcoin blowing the fuckin lid off the crypto thing, replacing all bitcoin likenesses with that of the Potcoin emblem. Of course not, but i did expect a lot more than an interview with a super burnt out guy talking about trademarking and shit.

Come to think of it, i think that has a lot of to do with the current state of things. Dude talks a big game about everything and a lot of "just waits" and "have faiths" which everyone involved with this crap has heard a million times. Okay, cool, there is a radio add, good step in the right direction. But what was all the hype about 4/20 about? They set up a booth and did some promoting, and then went to the cannabis cup and "did so many dabs" In all honesty, the news of the investor and the anticipation of the news that was to happen on 4/20 was 100 times better than any of the shit that ACTUALLY happened.

I think some of that investor money should have spent on some public relations or hiring someone that is a little better at communicating with the public  

How can you say 1.5 th/s of scrypt mining power is NOT asics? Well by using the timewarp thing and claiming it is like an accumulation, just a fault in reporting because of how the time warp fucks things up, that does explain how it might not be asics. But 1.5 th/s, how many cards are needed for that, if it isn't asics. I do think it is some type of attack, but if it isn't an error in reporting and it isn't asics, holy shit.


That is what i am wondering. It is a very aggressive approach to burn the candle at both ends so to say. You decrease supply by halving while in the meantime constantly work at gaining acceptance and utility for the coin.