So, in other altcoins you don't think ASIC resistance is a feature?
One of the factors that makes a coin valuable is the number of users/holders, i.e. the distribution. The more people that hold a coin, the more value it has, usually. If more people can be involved in the mining or folding process due to Curecoin being 80% ASIC proof then that makes for a stronger foundation of support for the project.
In altcoins where the possible options are that asics are met with 1. adoption or 2. resistance, it could be considered a feature.
In a coin that has NOTHING to do with asics except for the negation of, it's not a feature. It's a non-topic.
"Asic resistance" is a buzz word. No one cares about it. I guess not no one. You do. You and everyone else that feels the need to define the negation of something that doesn't exist in the first place, hence (once again) why I said it was redundant. Not wrong. Redundant. Actually, "asic resistant" is wrong and "asic proof" is redundant.