It is a distributed trustless coinjoin implementation, that being the difference. Were you hiding under a rock when we discussed this long ago?
And how do you protect against a user that create tons of sockpupet-addresses to map anonymized addresses ?
. And you also do the mixing in multiple nodes. So if it goes over 20 nodes, the bad actor must control all nodes, not just one or the majority of them.
LOL really ? Are you serious ? I want to see the source.