Funny how a theory of global destruction is such a big deal when radiation from Fukushima is blanketing the globe and is a very real threat proven to exist. Why do you consider this less of a threat?
Lets assume what you say is true, what can we do to stop it ?
Do you understand what I'm getting at ?
What is the level of radiation I will receive from this from the other side of the world ? How does it compare to existing background radiation ?
Maybe the point is you have a lot to learn. Unless you want me to start sending invoices for tutoring maybe you should learn for yourself.
P.S. Answering a question with more questions is not an answer.
Ok, I'll edit it.
Lets assume you are correct. There is nothing we can do about Fukishma. It is 100% a complete red herring.
You obviously can't use logic.
The amount of radiation I am receiving from Fukushima is not measurable, and furthermore any radiation I measure can not be attributed to Fukushima. Correlation does not mean causation.
If you are a tutor, then move amongst retards with money because that is the only way it'll work !