The false attribution of human death or misery to climate change BY HUMANS is the issue.
Wrong. This is definitely not a question of happenstance but of extent.
Small but consistent changes in climate can be the difference between a healthy river that supports farmers and an empty river which is useless and forces people to move.
This happened to Syria.
Denying that climate change is happening and is affecting humans and is caused by humans is not supported by the facts.
A lot of people don't like the facts but if you were to produce evidence that does not come from a biased source that what you say is correct then I'll listen. You claim, you do not argue.
Nobody will claim that man has not affected climate
regionally. In some cases for the better, in some far fewer cases for the worse. River flow, though, is not climate. Smog over China is a good example of regional man made climate change.
We have seen the political discussion slide from AGW to "climate change" and now to "climate disruption". Generally, this argument is that man has somehow affected "world wide climate" in ways that cause him to experience more harmful effects from weather. This is not the same argument as regional climate change.