Ten members have expressed a desire to resign their membership - out of a community of 1500+ .... this does not even amount to ONE PERCENT OF OUR MEMBERSHIP. The thread has been closed, it has not been removed, or censored.
This community HAS spoken, and their voice, overwhelmingly, is in favor of Brock Pierce. Those that continue to harp on the issue are doing more damage to the community and the future of Bitcoin than Brock Pierce has done, or will do.
https://bitcoinfoundation.org/forum/index.php?/topic/965-brocks-rebuttal/The Bitcoin Foundation now appears to be claiming that they had an open election for Brock. The individual members had their chance to vote on the issue and only 10 voted to resign. The foundation claims this demonstrates an overwhelming support for Brock and the issue is now closed.
Why we're individual members only given the option to resign or shut up and stay as their ballot choices?
Have the 1500 individual members been represented fairly by the foundation.
Was the option to resign a valid measure of the intent of the individual members?
Xtib