Dooglus you are with the website which looks like it was designed by a 14 year old, how anyone could design a crappier looking website I have no idea but it definitely sounds like an accomplishment.
It featured red text on a red background for much of its user interface. It had almost no traffic. And the investment feature they copied from JD was so badly botched that early investors were able to withdraw investments made by later investors. Kind of an unintentional Ponzi scheme.
It would have been funny if so many people didn't lose coins to the owner's incompetence.
Another person has mentioned the same flaw, surprise surprise, we must be both shills for the same website which no longer exists? How does pointing out your flaws supposedly helps promote another website again?
I didn't say you were trying to promote your dead site. I was wondering if perhaps you were butthurt because your site was such a horrific failure in every way, and so you feel like the only way to explain it is to decide that successful sites must be scams in some way.
Perhaps I have read the post before, I wasn't aware that someone else had made the same exact accusation some time ago, however I don't see how it helps your case.
The "someone else" made the exact same crazy point in the same aggressive way, exhibited the same faulty reasoning and had the same writing style as you. He had also already been identified as one of your socks independently of me. So it's either a really weird coincidence, or you're not being entirely truthful.
Anyway, thanks for playing. It's been fun.