I do not understand the irony.
You are endeavoring to reinvent money. Money is not an enterprise. There is no general name for what it actually is, but as just one of its many functions, it mediates interactions between ALL enterprises. Therefore the solution needs to be far beyond enterprise-class, and far beyond sovereign-class.
Your plan is to explicitly co-opt bitcoin via a blockchain fork, using by your own words, rhetorical as they may be, only a large accumulation of (fiat) money as the tool. You imply that the global cryptocurrency franchise is something that can be bought. That is an uninspired enterprise-level business plan. If it actually worked, you'd better watch out for the next guy's fork. He might have an even bigger pile of fiat.
Have you considered that even fiat money issuers do not go so far as to pay dividends on cash?
As world-class institutions I offer 2 examples. One is the adversarial legal system. Is presuming people innocent of criminal charges the most cost-effective approach? Well, no, but only the adversarial system, where the state must confront and defeat every hare-brained defense, repeatedly ad nauseum, has left society feeling the remotest tinge of justice.
The adversarial system is also what works in nature. In the open ocean, every creature has to ruthlessly protect and defend its genome. There is almost no trust across genomes. And yet, a beautiful, balanced ecosystem emerges.
In this context, I think you underestimate the design of the mining function.
Your project will have its chance in the wild, and I will be disappointed in the universe if you succeed.