The facts in the OP are the facts, check them out for yourself.
The OP is distorting reality with claims of dev having 2mn, citing a post for the proposed airdrop that never happened and purposefully muddling it with the instamine distribution.
One thing though, this has ensured every coin is racing for anon features. Then we'll be on to the next "must have" feature. DRK took anon seriously so they have a jump start, the others will be on it now. Then when every coin is anon the next feature will pop up that all coins must have.
That's good in the broader sense of the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Competition for improving features benefits us significantly. The problem is that no-one is coding...
There is
1. A camp that is expecting Evan to open up DarkSend for cloning and then say "ah yes, DRK was a scam, we are better because we stole their DarkSend and are now holding the moral high ground": clear scam mentality.
2. A camp that is cloning Bytecoin into multiple coins - many of which have clueless devs that can't even make a fricking GUI front-end. More scam mentality.
3. A camp that is scrambling to make something with basic anonymity so that they can capitalize on the rise of DRK as DRK-alternatives because they can't wait for DarkSend. They are not really promoting technology, just trying to get into the cash stream. Further scam mentality.