Sorry but most in here are not saying that they are insolvent. What they are saying is that the intrusiveness goes above and beyond reason and is sprung on you with out any guidelines or clarification, thats not impotent rage. People are allowed to feel how they like about that, both in terms of the requirements themselves and what happens to the data, and discuss it too.
And that quote is out of context of the conversation which was about being asked for proof. He was saying that they don't ask for proof despite evidence to the contrary including a user who posted after that.
I'm aware of the context.
And as I said before: I (and all the other cases I've heard of, except for one now I guess) appeared to get out of those questions just fine without providing ridiculously complicated proofs.
Well there's three now. The guy in the thread here, the guy on reddit and the guy on Bitstamps thread. Its by the by anyway and if its happening at all it needs discussion. The just because you were okay and answered the questions and didn't have to provide proof doesn't really seem an objective point of view when addressing the topic. Anecdote != data.