Well I'm discussing the topic either way not saying they are definitely not asking for proof which is the whole issue.
1)how many times does someone have to say we're not saying they're insolvent for you to stop putting up that straw man when replying to someone who's said they're not saying they're insolvent several times.
2)Agree, isn't this one of the things I've been saying.
3)So you can't see the other guy in this thread and the guy in the Stamp thread. Its cool though, ignore them. Even if its not regular should it not concern people that at any point you could be asked to provide proof that you, for whatever reasons they may be , don't want to provide, after the being verified and making the trade and initiating a withdrawal request.
Thats fine I don't think there's much benefit in continuing but understand why people are concerned instead of just calling it impotent rage.
1) Look, you can be all blasé about it and continue saying I'm strawmanning, but fact is that more than one guy in here already got the wrong impression. So, since I consider it important, I want to drive home this point. As often as necessary.
3) Alright, sorry for the "impotent rage". Uncalled for. But see my perspective again. I never traded on gox. One day, I stumble onto this huuuge thread of withdrawal delays. Every day, another page added. Go back a week later. Thread still growing, people still saying "naah, it's fine, they're just a bit slow".
I watched this shits for months! That's a situation in which I get worried about the enterprise as a whole.
I'm sorry for the guys who seem to have stuck a withdrawal now. In my experience, Bitstamp support is fast and rather generous in resolving those issues. If they aren't resolved in a week or two, or more cases pile up, I will change my tune. Until then, I can have sympathy with them individually, but I'm not worried about stamp.