Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW

That part:

Quote

If the pool doesn't pay the correct amount to the correct node, we'll know and we'll shame them. We'll get miners to move to honest pools.

...won't work. We couldn't even get the miners of coinmine to switch when they were >51% because they were getting consistency and low variance (compared to the official which was DOS'ed).

The days of 2-3 pools also seem to be over: http://drk.poolhash.org/poolhash.html

The pie chart is revealing.

Just use hard fork and another system of election/payment that doesn't affect network stability. "Honest pools" won't work. Guaranteed.

My thoughts exactly.

@Propulsion
Is this really a non-issue?

Your issue is the equivalent of asking what if one pool creates their own generated bitcoins instead of twenty five per block.

That is not what I mean. I edited my previous post to be more clear.

As I currently understand Evan's plan:
Network pays pool 100% of reward - pool must split reward 80/20 - 80% to miners, 20% to masternode

Are you are saying a dishonest pool can't break this system? Or I am misunderstanding what Evan proposed.