Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
Since a boardmember requires 5000 shares and it is stated nowhere
that a boardmember is required to be a natural person I suggest
that minority shareholders with sufficient stake agree to pool
their shares into a groupentity.
There should be more then enough people that have 100 or more
direct shares to also get one seat together. I suggest that the
person to become boardmember shall be elected representitive
for this group by votes per direct shares per group member.
Your control of your shares shall not leave you, all that will be
required is a signed message to agree to form the group and
give boardmemberstatus to group by proxy.
Anyone interested can contact me.
Editing: Grammer and spelling
Second edit: Maybe 50 shares is fine, too?
Also 1/5th of required shares are allready interested
that a boardmember is required to be a natural person I suggest
that minority shareholders with sufficient stake agree to pool
their shares into a groupentity.
There should be more then enough people that have 100 or more
direct shares to also get one seat together. I suggest that the
person to become boardmember shall be elected representitive
for this group by votes per direct shares per group member.
Your control of your shares shall not leave you, all that will be
required is a signed message to agree to form the group and
give boardmemberstatus to group by proxy.
Anyone interested can contact me.
Editing: Grammer and spelling
Second edit: Maybe 50 shares is fine, too?
Also 1/5th of required shares are allready interested
I would ask for those who wish to be involved to be very careful in doing this. To be considered as a board member, all 5000 shares must be under one bitcoin address. When the group shares are collectively gathered under one address, the "representative" is considered the sole owner of ALL the shares (to friedcat) and will be treated similarly to the Havelock Passthru. Keep in mind as well that should friedcat be willing to go through with this during this busy time, it will require agreement from all parties before the group is able to split the shares back to the rightful owners again. We all want information on AM's current status and the next incoming dividend but understand the potential consequences (and headache) from this endeavor.
EDIT: Bitfair has already posted similar thoughts already. Jutarul has been forthcoming with all available information; as tough as it is, it's best to sit tight for now.