Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet
by
illodin
on 28/05/2014, 21:19:11 UTC
May not answer all your questions, but from what I have gathered, the current implementation is mixer based off a masternode. Revision 2 will utilize decentralized nodes in the sense that any wallet can act as an xnode and will utilize a separate protocal which can be run over TOR. Would be cool if android wallets supported xnode functionality, though just being able to stake will be nice.


Thanks.. so from this q&A it seems the current implementation is basically a centralized mixer server/node implementation.  Which means sense to me..  and how i can see this being closed source.  

Basically somewhat like what you can already do with any coin by sending coins to exchanges, and then sending it from exchanges -> another address.

I think decentralization may be quite the challenge to implement... I'll look back if this actually achieves implementation and code posted for it.. that would be interesting to see.


Code:
Anonymity

1. Q) What does 'Xnode' mean? Any details?*

        - Xnode is the s/w that runs the anonimizer.

         - Xnode talks with client and provides TX details.

2. Q) What is next? Do you have a set schedule?

          - Next is to continue development on the decentralized anonymous solution. Current schedule is 3-4 weeks.

3. Q) Why v0.9.1.4x11-coin-1.0 is an anonymous wallet even if the 'Anonymous Transactions' are under development?

           - You can use the feature now but is not multi-path paradigm technology that is what is being developed.




I suggest you spend your precious time developing features for AsiaCoin instead of sneaking on other coins' threads attempting to discredit them.

I don't see it as discredit. It's a centralized mixer at this point. It's good to have a plan, but as we all know all kinds of issues can come up when actually developing and going live with it. And when it's done, someone qualified should surely review the code and architecture.

Calling it discredit makes you seem too emotionally vested in the market price.