Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Quark investors - Quark information on cycles and the push to move towards PoS.
by
DeathAndTaxes
on 29/05/2014, 00:55:39 UTC
if PoS provides for more security how come advanced check-pointing was conceived with PoS only?

Because it isn't. PoS suffers from a "nothing at risk" problem.  An attacker can use coins they no longer have but did have at one point in the past to attack the network.  Actually there is no reason to not do this.  If the attacker is unsucessful well they lose nothing in the attempt and if they are successful they get all their coins "back" (that they may have lost, had stolen, or sold).  Checkpoints limit how far back the chain can be reorged but they don't solve the nothing at stake problem, only limit the extent of the damage.

Please tell us which PoS coin has been attacked by so called "nothing at risk" problem.

None definitively although more than one POS coin has been 51% attacked.  Many of them have stake requirements which are negligible so often cheap attack is easier than a more sophisticated nothing at stake attack.  No POS coin has extensive history in the field other than PPC and it avoids an attack by using 100% centralized checkpoints.   Still you don't really believe that "hasn't happened" = "can't happen"?  Bitcoin has never been 51% attacked therefore you believe an attack is impossible?