My preferences are not important. The point is that a system that does not allow the forcible return of stolen property will not be acceptable to society, except for thieves and other criminals. In the end, it will be rejected even by the libertarians who now think that irreversibility is a good thing.
People here consider a money that is impossible to steal a better solution than empowering a central authority with the ability confiscate and return funds that they deem "stolen". Apparently there are some who don't think that's better, so it must be a matter of preference.