Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
KFR
on 29/05/2014, 17:52:27 UTC
Fortunately for you, if these things bother you and you'd rather have a malleable money supply managed by unelected officials who can seize funds and reverse transactions at will: you are well served with the current monetary paradigm - be it Keynesian, monetarist or neocon - the differences are of cosmetic character, really.

Those of us with the (obviously wrong!) view that a monetary system should be predictable and not prone to manipulation by individuals have been longing for the chance to try out something like that. It will quite obviously fail, because centralized systems run by experts are naturally superior to decentralized systems run by no one but some people just need to convince themselves on their own, deferring to the wise opinions of experts is not enough for them. And who knows - if by some freak accident such a monetary system turns out to be better than what we have now, you will benefit as well Wink
My preferences are not important.  The point is that a system that does not allow the forcible return of stolen property will not be acceptable to society, except for thieves and other criminals.  In the end, it will be rejected even by the libertarians who now think that irreversibility is a good thing.

Bitcoin is just as easy to "forcibly return" as cash, gold, precious metals or any other form of property.  If I'm wrong, please explain why.



You are very wrong. It is easier to return than cash or gold Wink

I just deleted my post because I saw other people had said more or less the same thing.  And you're quite right - thanks for pointing out my 'error'. Wink

It doesn't matter though.  It's not like Jorge is ever going to consider facts that fly in the face of his self-righteous crusade to "protect" the world from something he simply doesn't understand. Cool