Not quite. Someone builds a separate private chain with enough hashpower to ensure it will ultimately be longer than our current public one. They send a transaction from our current chain to an exchange, dump it and withdraw the BTC. Once it's all said and done they unload their longer, private chain onto the network which doesn't have the original deposit so it's as if it never happened and they keep their NOBL. They've already received their BTC, so by that time it's too late to protect the exchange. All the orphans are a result of our current public chain being overwritten by the privately built one when it's unloaded on to the network.
I know I sounds like a broken record.ASIC is fucking us,
This is technology.
Technology evolves...rapidly
Crypto will continue to evolve....rapidly
Just like in business, Cryptos that embrace this change will survive and grow.
I'm not going to flame, but why can't this rapidly evolving technology that needs to be embraced apply to ASICs?
Because it is far too cheap to acquire massive hash with them.
I'll give you one guess where the hash is coming from to create the longer chain?
AFA X11 FPGA is most certainly either here or will be soon.
we need an algo with a high Mem prerequisite.
On the bright side just got back and won at casino.
