Quote from: coine_smithe on May 30, 2014, 08:01:39 AM

Quote from: windjc on May 30, 2014, 07:57:18 AM

Quote from: coine_smithe on May 30, 2014, 07:55:25 AM

Quote from: windjc on May 30, 2014, 07:51:44 AM

Quote from: JGCMiner on May 30, 2014, 07:44:37 AM

Quote from: windjc on May 30, 2014, 07:39:59 AM

Quote from: toknormal on May 30, 2014, 07:36:31 AM

Quote from: windjc on May 30, 2014, 07:26:43 AM

The absolute worst coin you could trade if you didn't want governments to pay attention to you is

DRK

Don't kid yourself that regulators give a damn about whether cryptos have transparent blockchains or not Wink

Look, all regulators need (look for) is an excuse. Anonymity is the perfect excuse.

Up till now, regulators in the US have been pro-bitcoin because law enforcement tells them that transactional crime in crypto is actually easier to track due to the leger.

DRK is a different story and can be used as a sound bite or a example of the "crackdown" if it comes.

Politics = perception = reality.

Lot of assumptions in this post. It doesn't make sense to pass on the money to be made by adding DRK because of paranoid assumptions.

You are not hearing the words coming out of my mouth. I own some DRK. I will gladly ride this train. I think its utterly stupid for Finex to add this coin.

Sounds like the government has you scared. If everyone thought like that nothing would get done.

OMG. Put it to rest. DRK is not even the best anonymous coin in existence. I'm talking strictly dumb business decision on Finex's part. Sorry if I hurt your DRK feelings.

Actually I think this is my first time commenting here. I just invested a little so I was browsing this. You sound like you feel like arguing with the wind tonight or maybe just a troll. Can't tell.

my guess is spreading a little FUD.