Well, wikipedia is not a public driven project. It is driven by a limited community of it's editors,
that is for a long time. Wikipedia represent collective and often inconsistent point of view
of a small (compared to society) group of people.
"Playing by the rules" is a favorite game of them. Don't play that game, do not entertain them.
I believe, it is some form of sexual perversion, wikipedism or like that...
Just find another wikipedia editor and he will play instead of you.
that is for a long time. Wikipedia represent collective and often inconsistent point of view
of a small (compared to society) group of people.
"Playing by the rules" is a favorite game of them. Don't play that game, do not entertain them.
I believe, it is some form of sexual perversion, wikipedism or like that...
Just find another wikipedia editor and he will play instead of you.
There is Wikipedia and its hierarchy, just like government and their hierarchy. The idea that the government could represent the people is laughable.
Similarly, the Wikipedia hierarchy devolved into politicking, no sexual perversion needed.