It sounds like they are ranking the orders based on the initial price when the order was placed.  If someone adjusts the price, they should refresh what the new order ranking should be.

Example:
Order #12 @ price 0.9 … 1 Gh/s limit … running (100 miners)
Order #11 @ price 0.8 … no limit  … running (all remaining miners)
Order #15 @ price 0.7 … no limit  … in queue
Order #10 @ price 0.5 … no limit  … in queue

---Order #10 adjusts price to 0.7/no limit
Order #12 @ price 0.9 … 1 Gh/s limit … running (100 miners)
Order #11 @ price 0.8 … no limit  … running (all remaining miners)
Order #15 @ price 0.7 … no limit  … in queue
Order #10 @ price 0.7 … no limit  … in queue

---New order #16 is placed at 0.7/no limit
Order #12 @ price 0.9 … 1 Gh/s limit … running (100 miners)
Order #11 @ price 0.8 … no limit  … running (all remaining miners)
Order #15 @ price 0.7 … no limit  … in queue
Order #10 @ price 0.7 … no limit  … in queue
Order #16 @ price 0.7 … no limit  … in queue

It sounds like Odie and others are seeing order #16 jumping ahead of #10 which is not fair since they placed the order after an existing order increased their price.