Re: [QCN] QuazarCoin | Privacy&Data protection | CPU only

When I compare http://minin.gs/qcn to other pools like http://qcn.ext-pool.net/ and http://qcn.extremepool.org/, I see that minin.gs gets a block every 39,000,000 - 40,000,000 hashes, where http://qcn.ext-pool.net/ has not found a block with over 1,080,074,071 shares. It looks as if smaller pools do not stand a chance. Could it be that minin.gs has a different (better) configuration or is there something wrong with the mining distribution formula of the coin?

+1 good question

i can answer. my pool change config worker difficulty daily not fixed. Worker difficulty fact follow for Network difficulty.

Thanks. This helped me a lot setting up a pool. I changed the difficulty to around 17.000 and finally the pool is getting blocks.

The pool is available on http://qcnpool.org. Mac users might want to use the Mac OS X GUI miner that can be downloaded from the home page.

And somehow the pool seems to be stuck again...It looks like we should all mine at minin.gs if we want our hashes to be worth anything. Is it ok if 'one pool mines them all' or could someone point out how to get the other pools going?

My configuration looks like this (difficulty was 17000):

Code:

"poolServer": {
"enabled": true,
"clusterForks": "auto",
"poolAddress": "1RPEgDQDVMG6Tm3...6N3rcVNeB8W1jJ1",
"blockRefreshInterval": 1000,
"minerTimeout": 900,
"ports": [
{
"port": 2222,
"protocol": "tcp",
"difficulty": 15000,
"desc": "Stratum+TCP Port"
},
{
"port": 3333,
"protocol": "tcp",
"difficulty": 15000,
"desc": "Stratum+TCP Port"
}
],
"varDiff": {
"minDiff": 5000,
"maxDiff": 25000,
"targetTime": 100,
"retargetTime": 1440,
"variancePercent": 10,
"maxJump": 1000
},
"shareTrust": {
"enabled": true,
"min": 10,
"stepDown": 3,
"threshold": 10,
"penalty": 30
},
"longPolling": {
"enabled": false,
"timeout": 8500
},

"banning": {
"enabled": true,
"time": 600,
"invalidPercent": 25,
"checkThreshold": 30
}
},